Casting 360 aka Talent 6 was fined $45,000 for fraud in 2010.

Click Here To View The Complaint Against Them By The State of California.

Casting 360 Is A Scam?

San Mateo County consumer protection authorities are warning aspiring actors around the nation to be extra careful when pursuing their dreams of stardom after they fined a South San Francisco talent agency Casting360 also known as Talent6 for breaking state laws.

The District Attorney’s Office Consumer Protection Unit said it opened the investigation into the Casting360 and Talent6 websites, after about 200 would-be entertainers complained about the company to the Better Business Bureau.

Casting360 aka Talent6 Fined $45, 000 for False Advertising, Misleading Ads & Fraud
The website links actors to potential auditions and charges them a fee upfront, then automatically charges them nearly $30 per month if they do not cancel, said Deputy District Attorney Chuck Finney. The site did not explain the contract to customers and in some cases advertised auditions that did not appear to exist, he said. The sites also used various employement sites advertising for actual jobs and then engaging in a “bait & switch” tactic.

The DA’s office sued the company in San Mateo County Superior Court last month, claiming it violated two sections of state business and professions law that outline misrepresentation and unfair practices. Each violation comes with a $2,500 fine per victim.

Judge Stephen Hall issued a judgment Thursday in which the company will pay a $45,000 fine to the DA’s office and its president will meet with Finney every four months for the next two years to discuss complaints against the company that consumers filed with authorities. The agency is also banned from advertising casting call opportunities “unless true” and from charging monthly fees without a customer’s consent. In Many cases the company made it nearly impossible to cancel the service and double billed thousands of victims.

Finney said the company has paid back nearly everyone who complained. But his office was concerned the salespeople were working on commission and not divulging the full agreement to actors, or doing whatever they could to seal a sale. Casting360 and Talent6 Call Centers are located In Moldova, a former Soviet Bloc republic. The company maintains a small adminstrative presence in the USA.

“Would-be actors need to really make sure that they understand what the relationship is, ” with talent managers, Finney said. “Young people are so star-struck that they think there is just a great opportunity out there.”

Attorneys for the company did not return calls for comment Friday. In the ruling, the company and its president, Igor Reiant, agreed to pay the fine and meet the judge’s demands.

Case CIV494748 – THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE VS. CASTING TALENT NETWORK dba Talent6

Case CIV494748 – Complaints/Parties 

Complaint Number: 0001 — COM COMPLAINT of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 
Original Filing Date: 05/04/2010
Complaint Status: Judgment 05/06/2010
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
PLAINTIFF  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  FINNEY, CHUCK   Judgment For 05/06/2010 
DEFENDANT  CASTING TALENT NETWORK, INC dba Talent6 Unrepresented  Judgment Against 05/06/2010 

Case CIV494748 – Actions/Minutes

Viewed
Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
  05/06/2010  STIPULATED JUDGMENT ENTERED AS FOLLOWS:   
    Minutes
JUDGMENT ENTERED ON COMPLAINT FILED 05/04/2010 OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JUDGMENT ENTERED ON COMPLAINT FILED 05/04/2010 OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGAINST CASTING TALENT NETWORK, INC
PRINCIPAL IS $45,000.00.
INTEREST IS $0.00.
COSTS ARE $355.00.
ATTORNEY FEES ARE $0.00.
TOTAL JUDGMENT $45,355.00
SEE FILE FOR SPECIFIC JUDGMENT DETAILS
  05/06/2010  (S) STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT & CONSENT D FILED    
  05/06/2010  FIRST PAPER FEE PAID BY CASTING TALENT NETWORK, INC.    
    Minutes
Receipt: 100506-0003            $355.00
05/04/2010  CIVIL CASE COVERSHEET RECEIVED 
05/04/2010  (S) COMPLAINT FILED 

- Source San Mateo Court


Google+ Profile